Data Analysis.
Which data you chose and why?
The data
I chose was a conversation between an adult and an almost 2 year old child. I chose
this data because I have an interest in the language children use from and
young age and how it develops when they grow older.
What you found and what
theory you linked it to
When looking at this data I found that it
included a lot of child directed speech from the adult, this is seen when the
adult in included uses a higher pitch and exaggerated intonation. A: Nooooo^
(.) you don’t want that to be your name^ (3) you’re being silly [giggles] this
is an example of how the parent in this video uses child directed speech as the
^ indicate a rise in pitch of her voice. Also the adjective of ‘silly’ is a
very childlike word, it is unusual that an adult would use that word in
conversation when directing at another adult. The theories that this links to
are Jean Piaget (1896-1980) cognitive development theory which he
stated that children cannot learn unless they are interacting with others and
their environment and by making mistakes they learn from them. Another theory
this links to is Jerome Bruner (1964) Bruner believes that the
child has to learn for itself by making sense of their own environment.
What other data you can
choose to go with it or replace it with to make an investigation
If I
was to choose another data, I would choose a different video of a recorded
child’s conversation who is aged 6 and another child who is aged 9 and compare
all the types of language used to see how children’s language develop as they
grow older.
What would you call that
investigation?
I would
name my investigation ‘The different language techniques used between children
of different ages’. I would call it that because it lets people understand that
it’s to do with the different language techniques children use at different
ages.
`
Good idea for looking at how child language develops. Could you get the same child at different ages somehow? See me for some help catching up.
ReplyDeleteMaybe you should go more in depth in terms of theory
ReplyDeleteThis is very good Siobhan, you could analyse more selections of the text x
ReplyDelete